Subject	2+2 TT ftw
Posted by	90tt2+2z (WI) on July 02, 2007 at 10:41 AM
	This message has been viewed 113 times.
In Reply To	Which one looks better 2+2 OR 2+0 AND HANDLES Better posted by Punjabi Z on July 02, 2007 at 12:35 AM
Message	Conversion in progress 1969 Dodge Charger 1974 Chevy Chevelle 1977 Lincioln Contenental--> for sale, WI Pickup only 1990 Nissan 240sx 1990 Nissan 300zx 2003 Chevy Cavilear 2003 Yamaha Zuma 2006 Nissian NISMO Frontier
Follow Ups	Which one looks better 2+2 OR 2+0 AND HANDLES Better - Punjabi Z 00:35:01 07/02/07 2+0 looks better,2+2 handles better(longer wheelbase) (n/m) - ArubaDave 00:38:39 07/02/07 Re: 2+0 looks better,2+2 handles better(longer wheelbase) (n - Punjabi Z 00:41:56 07/02/07 my input: - SactoTodd 00:39:52 07/02/07 2nd (n/m) - gnozahs 01:55:24 07/02/07 2+0 looks better. (n/m) - zleepertt(MD) 00:40:04 07/02/07 2nd - ZLover4Life 00:53:40 07/02/07 Re: Which one looks better 2+2 OR 2+0 AND HANDLES Better - z32ryan 00:59:05 07/02/07 Re: Re: Which one looks better 2+2 OR 2+0 AND HANDLES Better - Multi_Read 01:07:56 07/02/07 stock for stock, new the 2+2 was inferior in every single - LJZTT 10:32:23 07/02/07 That's just his Punjabi opinion (n/m) - zyoulater 01:36:02 07/02/07 different strokes for different folks.... - ben_96_slicktop (sold) 01:38:20 07/02/07 I'd say that about... - zleepertt(MD) 01:45:30 07/02/07 2nd (n/m) - BlackTT91 01:58:43 07/02/07 Agreed. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 06:22:02 07/02/07 lol yep (n/m) - TTFairladyZ 06:40:07 07/02/07 or don't know any different - LJZTT 10:39:08 07/02/07 yep (n/m) - Spee 12:02:16 07/02/07 ...in the US. (n/m) - ZiNnYc 12:07:13 07/02/07 2+0 definitely look better! Especially TT ones with the - 94Z32XTT 02:02:47 07/02/07 as for the ic slots...damn they better have'em if they're tt (n/m) - inf 14:14:24 07/02/07 IMHO..... the coupe looks better. - zx299 04:14:57 07/02/07 I call BS on anyone claiming better handling in a 2+2 unless - YugoBernie (NoVA) 06:23:45 07/02/07 The 2+0 looks better to me, can't comment on handling...... - FLEX 08:38:04 07/02/07 Yes. - Technomancer 09:31:18 07/02/07 I'd say the same thing, just with smaller words. (n/m) - Guapo 10:33:42 07/02/07 Psst. >> - Scotts94z32 12:24:52 07/02/07 mine are the previous non-A model. Great price on those - Guapo 13:48:26 07/02/07 lol, you can't be serious (n/m) - LJZTT 10:28:33 07/02/07 2+2 TT ftw - 90tt2+2z (WI) 10:41:48 07/02/07 Funny how you got a good angle at it so it doesn't look - rufflez 12:40:33 07/02/07 cept for the NA facsia... (n/m) - inf 14:12:54 07/02/07 i noticed, bigger rear quarter window. (n/m) - ghostinator (fl) 22:46:08 07/02/07 Nice sig (n/m) - gnozahs 13:12:24 07/02/07 Wait, 2+2 TT w/ NA facsia still? - inf 14:12:37 07/02/07 old pic (n/m) - 90tt2+2z (WI) 15:59:54 07/02/07 HA! i guess some things never change (n/m) - FLEX 21:09:01 07/02/07 btw this isnt a phpbb forum - ZiNnYc 12:09:01 07/02/07 Both are damn sexy - eriksu9 12:47:15 07/02/07 Technically, I know that the 2+2 has a wider wheel base - icanznow 17:46:33 07/02/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.